Skip to main content

Beyond the Arc: Is the Three-Point Shot the Future of Basketball—or Ruining It?

 

Remember when the three-pointer used to feel like a gamble? Back in the day, it was the cherry on top of an offense, not the whole cake. Fast forward to today, and the three-point line is practically the heartbeat of the NBA. Teams don’t just dabble in it—they live in it. Some fans love the fireworks. Others think it’s sucking the variety out of the game. So, where’s this all going? Let’s dig in.

The Rise of the Three

The three-pointer started out as a novelty, but analytics turned it into the smartest play in basketball. A 35% three is worth more than a 50% two, and coaches aren’t ignoring that math.

Look at the Golden State Warriors—Steph Curry and Klay Thompson basically stretched the floor to dimensions we’d never seen before. Their 2015–2019 dynasty was built on volume and efficiency from deep. At their peak in 2016, they took nearly 32 threes a game and made 41.6% of them—the best percentage in the league. That’s lethal math.

Houston took it even further. Under Daryl Morey and Mike D’Antoni, the Rockets launched an NBA-record 45.4 threes per game in 2019. They lived by the arc, with James Harden isolating and kicking to shooters. It didn’t win them a title, but it reshaped how everyone else thought about offense.

Milwaukee and Boston followed the blueprint, too. The Bucks surrounded Giannis with shooters and went from a middle-of-the-pack team to champions. The Celtics bombed away 42 three-point attempts per game last season—second in the league—and rode that spacing to the Finals.



The Flip Side: When It Goes Wrong

But here’s the problem: not every team is the Warriors. Some squads are tossing up threes just because “that’s what the numbers say,” even when they don’t have the shooters to pull it off.

Take the 2018 Houston Rockets in Game 7 of the Western Conference Finals. They missed 27 straight threes against Golden State. Twenty-seven! At some point, you’ve got to try something different—but they didn’t, and it cost them a Finals trip.

Or look at the current league trends: teams averaged nearly 35 three-point attempts per game last season, compared to just 18 a decade ago. But not everyone is efficient. The Orlando Magic finished near the bottom of the league, hitting only 34.6% from deep—yet still jacked up over 32 attempts a night. That’s math without context, and it leads to ugly basketball when the shots don’t fall.

Is It Ruining the Game?

Critics argue that basketball’s lost some of its soul. Gone are the days of dominant post players like Shaq or midrange killers like Rip Hamilton. Now, many games look the same: five guys circling the perimeter, hunting for threes. For fans who grew up on bruising battles in the paint, it can feel repetitive.

On the other hand, the game is faster, more open, and arguably more exciting. Watching Curry pull up from 30 feet or Damian Lillard hit a dagger three is pure theater. For younger fans, this is basketball now.

Finding Balance for the Future

So, what’s next? The future of basketball probably isn’t “more threes at all costs.” It’s balance.

Nikola Jokic just won back-to-back MVPs (and a Finals MVP) not because he bombs threes, but because he blends everything—post scoring, passing, midrange floaters, and yes, an occasional three. Joel Embiid dominates from the inside out. Kevin Durant and Kawhi Leonard are reminders that the midrange is far from dead; in fact, it can be the perfect Plan B when defences take away the three.

Even analytics are maturing. Teams are realizing it’s not just about volume but about shot quality. A wide-open corner three from a good shooter? That’s still gold. A contested pull-up from 28 feet? Not so much.



Final Thoughts

The three-pointer isn’t ruining basketball, and it isn’t the only future. It’s a weapon—maybe the most important one right now—but the game is too smart and too adaptive to let things get stale. We’ll see teams continue to lean on the three, but the real winners will be the ones who balance it with versatility, creativity, and a plan B (and C).

Because at the end of the day, basketball’s beauty has always been in its variety—and no single shot, even the mighty three, should take that away.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Who Killed Creativity in Coaching Basketball? And How We Can Bring It Back

  Who Killed Creativity in Coaching Basketball? And How We Can Bring It Back Basketball was once a game filled with improvisation, flair, and individuality. But take a look around today—from youth leagues to elite programs across the globe—and it seems everyone is playing the same way. The same plays. The same sets. The same drills. So, who killed creativity in coaching basketball? And more importantly, how do we revive it? The Death of Creativity! The primary suspect? Copy-paste coaching . As the NBA grew in global popularity, so did the urge to mimic its stars and systems. Coaches at all levels—especially youth and grassroots— started copying professional schemes, terminology, and philosophies without adjusting for context or age-appropriate development. Basketball became a game of rigid structure: motion sets, horns actions, read-and-react sequences—borrowed from the pros but often misunderstood and poorly executed by kids still learning how to dribble and pass. Global Uniformi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Modern Spacing: Rethinking Offense from the End First

  Modern Spacing: Rethinking Offense from the End First When you ask most basketball coaches what the most important element of offense is, they’ll tell you: spacing . But while this term gets thrown around constantly in clinics, practices, and strategy sessions, its true meaning is often misunderstood—or at least, underdeveloped. Here’s the problem: most coaches talk about spacing only in terms of the initial setup . Whether it’s a 5-out, 4-out-1-in, or any other alignment, the focus tends to be on where players start. And sure, every team from youth leagues to the pros uses some form of modern 5-out spacing today. But let’s ask the real question: Are they truly playing 5-out offense—or are they just starting in a 5-out formation?   My opinion is, if your big begins on the perimeter and then sets a ball screen before diving and staying in the paint, is that still 5-out? Technically, no. You've started with five players spaced wide but finished with clogged lanes and com...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Art of Random Offense: Coach Carlisle's Vision for Modern Basketball – Could It Work in Youth Basketball?

  When you hear the word "random" in basketball, you might think of chaos or disorganization. But for Indiana Pacers head coach Rick Carlisle, "random offense" is anything but. It’s a philosophy rooted in creativity, improvisation, and trust—qualities that define the Pacers’ style of play today. This approach sparks an intriguing question: could the same philosophy work at lower levels, such as high school or youth basketball? While it might inspire creativity and freedom in young players, it also raises challenges around structure, fundamentals, and consistency. What is Random Offense? At its core, random offense is about playing without rigid set plays. Instead of relying on scripted actions, the offense flows from principles and instincts. Each possession is unique, driven by player reads, spacing, and chemistry. For defenses, this unpredictability is a nightmare—there’s no single playbook to scout. Carlisle describes it as more than just basketball strategy; it’...
Post a Comment
Read more